From SBS’ President
Stem Cell - Research & Public Policy
By Al Kolb
This column is a departure from the usual coverage of events and activities at SBS, but it is an important topic that affects us all. I’m sure that many of you have been following the advances in human stem cell research and the ongoing debate about this research. During my travels to Europe, I was struck by the different public perceptions
and regulations regarding human stem cell research between the European Union and the United States. While there are critics in Europe, this type of research has been largely accepted by individuals
and governments. Regulations are in place for the development and use of human stem cell lines and research centers are flourishing with support from the EU and funding from individual governments.
The public perception of stem cell research in the US is less accepting than in Europe. Restrictions on the use of federal grants to develop new human stem cells lines have led universities and states
to develop their own funding methods. The $10 billion bond issue in California for this research is probably the most well known funding scheme to circumvent federal restrictions. This is not an
ideal solution because it could create an inequality where rich states and well funded universities will dominate research and concentrate talent even more than is currently the case. Federal funding
can act to level the playing field and it gives more people the opportunity to participate. While some research requires the “big science” approach, a more diverse number of small labs can
make tremendous contributions.
Public Policy Affects Science
Stem cell research is not the first, nor will it be the last, example of how public perception and government regulations are having a significant impact on the ability
of scientists to conduct research. A similar debate took place in the 1970s and ‘80s over the genetic engineering of organisms. In this case, the debate in the US led to compromises that allowed
rapid advances in the field and the growth of the biotechnology industry. The scientific advances from this research continue to benefit mankind.
In some European countries, the debate led to a very different outcome. Strict government regulations on the use of genetic engineering were enacted that effectively prevented this research. While international
pharmaceutical companies could move research to more accepting climates, universities cannot move, and entrepreneurs who wished to capitalize on this research were unable to do so in their own countries.
The negative effects of these regulations have largely been eliminated over time, but it does show the significant impact that the public can have on science.
While it is unlikely that the US will fall behind in stem cell research, it is difficult to predict how shifting political climates could affect this possibility. Regardless, the debate does once again
emphasize the importance of public acceptance for science. A more informed public and ready access to information ensures that society will continue to shape policy. Should SBS as an organization of
scientists in drug discovery take an active role in a debate to support issues critical to our member’s goals and success, or should we restrict our activities to the science? I don’t have
an answer, but I do think we can have an influence. Time and circumstances will determine how we respond to future events.
For now, we will give our members the opportunity to share their research and network through conferences and symposia. At the annual conference in Seattle, there was an excellent presentation on stem
cell research at Pfizer. If the attendance at this presentation is any indication, it’s a field of great interest to SBS members. Partly in response to this interest, SBS is sponsoring a symposium
entitled Back to Pharmacology: Stem Cells & Primary Cells in Drug Discovery from November 7 to 8, 2007, at the Anaheim Marriott Hotel in Anaheim, California. More information will be posted on the
SBS website in the near future. This should be a wonderful opportunity to share results and discuss policy.
But we don’t have to wait until November to continue this discussion. I’d like to remind everyone again that the next annual conference in April is close at hand. The program has been set
and it looks to be another excellent week of leading edge science on topics critical to drug discovery. There will be presentations in the systems biology session on stem cells and cell-based assays
in general that will increase our understanding of the potential of this field. Although it is a short time between annual meetings, the large number of abstracts received shows that support for the
conference is undiminished. I look forward to seeing you in Montréal in April.
|
SBS International
High-Content Screening: Merging Functional Genomics & Chemical Biology in Germany
By Eberhard Krausz
Head, HT-Technology Development Studio
Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology & Genetics
Dresden, Germany
High-throughput screening is no longer the sole privilege or duty of the pharmaceutical industry. Mainly in Northern America, but increasingly in other parts of the world as well, a remarkable number of
academic screening centers have been established primarily to screen chemical drug-like molecule libraries as molecular modulators of protein functions. In parallel, in the past few years, high-content
screening (HCS) based on automated microscopy—particularly in combination with RNA interference for discovery of gene functions in model organisms or in human cells—has been evolving at a
number of leading institutes in Europe.
TDS at MPI-CBG
The High-Throughput Technology Development Studio (TDS; http://tds.mpi-cbg.de/webtds/), which is the central high-content screening unit at the Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics
in Dresden, Germany (MPI-CBG; www.mpi-cbg.de), was founded in 2003 based on a concept elaborated by institute directors Professor Marino Zerial and Dr. Ivan Baines, with seed funding by the institute.
The aim is to develop complex phenotypic cell-based assays in close collaboration with internal and external research groups, and to perform HCS by applying automated microscopy and pattern recognition
for image analysis in cultured mammalian cells and in model organisms such as the worm C.elegans. One of the primary goals is to provide an infrastructure to identify functions of genes on a genome-wide
scale, applying RNA interference that allows silencing of any targeted genes selectively.
The TDS is also involved in the multi-center RNA Interference Initiative to discover gene functions and the MPG Chemical Genomics Center (CGC; www.cgc.mpg.de) to screen for chemical probes that specifically
modulate biological processes. Both of these programs are funded by the Max Planck Society. We are also grateful for two years of support by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research, through its
InnoRegio concept of promoting regional key expertise, especially in joint commercial and academic partnerships.
Our network of biological research partners at the MPI-CBG and the Technical University, Dresden was founded on the academic side to develop complex phenotypic assays, and with its partners on the industrial
side to develop technology in automated microscopy (Evotec Technologies GmbH, Hamburg & Berlin, Germany); automated pattern recognition and image analysis (Definiens AG, Munich, Germany); and RNA
Interference (Cenix BioScience GmbH, Dresden). Additional partnerships were entered into subsequently for lab automation (TECAN AG, Männedorf, Switzerland) and automated microscopy at lower throughput (Cellomics Inc., Pittsburgh, PA).
At the TDS, 12 specialists in cell biology, biochemistry, microscopy, automation, image analysis and information technology work hand in hand in an interdisciplinary fashion to address the challenge of establishing an automated work environment and to deal with the very large data sets generated by large-scale high-throughput automated microscopy-based screening.
Robust, Flexible Infrastructure
In setting up the TDS, we tried to standardize the work flow using automation as much as possible, but still remaining flexible. This was made possible by building integrated conveyor belt-like systems.
Cells are counted after trypsination by a CASY cell counter TT (Schaerfe System GmbH, Reutlingen, Germany) and seeded subsequently by dispensers. To pack and deliver the RNAi molecules into the cells,
a custom-designed transfection robot was assembled (Freedom Evo 200/8 platform, TECAN) that is completely incorporated into a laminar flow at biosafety level S2. The TDS is probably the first academic
laboratory in the world that has established high-throughput siRNA transfection at 55,000 samples per 24 hours in a 384-well format. This was accomplished by applying the Te-Mo 384-steel needle head
(TECAN) without using plastic tips, thereby saving up to 15,000 euros in consumables per genome-wide run.
Two additional robotic systems of the same type assist in cell processing and all other in-house projects that require automated liquid handling. To acquire data of biochemical/homogeneous assays, we
use a highly sensitive reader for electrochemiluminescence (SECTOR Imager, Meso Scale Discovery) as well as two readers for colorimetric, luminescent and fluorescent signals (Genios Plus and Genios Pro,
TECAN). For automated image acquisition at a throughput of up to 100,000 three-color images per day, we use the OPERA QEHS (Evotec Technologies). This confocal high-throughput fluorescent microscope
is powered by solid-state lasers at three to four different wavelengths, and is therefore capable of taking pictures by three CCD cameras in parallel. Images at resolutions up to 60-fold magnification
are achieved.
To complement OPERA’s confocal optics, we have two epifluorescent ArrayScan VTI systems (Cellomics) that generally work around the clock with little to no supervision to perform large-scale screens
where confocal imaging is not required (as is frequently the case for culture cells). The images acquired by the OPERA are applied to image analysis with commercial software packages (Acapella by Evotec
Technologies or Cellenger by Definiens), or are analyzed with in-house software solutions such as MotionTracking II (designed and programmed by Yannis Kalaidzidis) to identify desired phenotypical patterns.
The ArrayScan VTI provides its own image-analysis software packages called BioApplications.
All data are fed into a web-based front end laboratory information management system that was developed at the TDS, installed on freeware server components, and is conceptually designed for the special
needs of HCS, with millions of images linked to other important HCS data such as image processing and analysis results; siRNA molecule design and validation data; assay protocols, plate formats; and
more.
We have gathered numerous substance collections centrally that can be applied in individual projects. Preliminary priority is given to various RNAi libraries—for example, chemically synthesized
siRNA libraries covering human and mouse kinases; the whole human genome; and enzymatically derived genome-wide esiRNA libraries for mouse and human. The latter were actually produced at the TDS in close
collaboration with Frank Buchholz (MPI-CBG Group Leader), a co-inventor with Dun Yang in the laboratory of Michael C. Bishop at the University of California San Francisco of esiRNA technology.
Further, we have a genome-wide collection of clones in E.coli that express RNAi molecules upon feeding C.elegans worms over numerous generations of progeny. Currently, we are expanding by
acquiring chemical drug-like small molecule libraries. Professor Herbert Waldmann of the Max Planck Institute in Dortmund and the MPG Chemical Genomics Center are sources for innovative and proprietary
molecule selections, partially natural products, and derivatives thereof. We are actively searching for new partners in order to expand the collections.
Assay Development & Screening Projects
The focus of our current activities is on developing novel complex cell-based assays for automated microscopy and, as a second priority, performing screening of molecular libraries at high-throughput.
Usually, individual bench-scale experiments are taken out of the collaborating research labs (most frequently, but not exclusively, the research groups at the MPI-CBG) and developed into screenable assays
in the labs of the TDS. This service is provided on a cost-recovery basis. We also have a user facility that provides open access after initial training and prior booking to a remarkable range of equipment
and instrumentation, such as two liquid handling platforms; a homogeneous reader; and an ArrayScan VTI that everyone in the institute or in collaborating labs can use to run their own experiments and
projects.
Criteria for taking collaborative projects on board include, among others, positive assessment on feasibility; strong data demonstrating reproducibility along with a comfortably big screening window,
such that the induced phenotype by a number of selected positive controls is clearly distinct from the negative control treated cells exhibiting the normal phenotype—i.e., the variance of both
signals must not overlap. In order to transfer an assay into the TDS labs, it must already exhibit reproducibility and practicability as well as the specificity of the controls and distinctiveness of
the specific signal over background—all standard criteria for reducing an assay to practice.
First, the assay is miniaturized down to at least a 96-well format, and the protocols are optimized particularly with consideration for future automation and cost minimization. Further, transfection
of the siRNA molecules is optimized, and image analysis scripts are elaborated. Finally, the whole process is adapted to lab automation. Subsequently, during the validation process, several independent
runs are performed of plates with negative and positive controls. Variation within a plate, among replicas of identical plates, and among the three independent runs are determined and assessed. If
the process passes these quality control criteria, a small pilot study is started, applying a few plates from a reference library. For a proper screening project, at least two—and ideally, three—independent
runs are performed. Eventually, hits must be independently verified in secondary assays.
Since the TDS went operational in the summer of 2004, we have developed a number of innovative multi-parametric phenotypic assays and implemented various large-scale screening projects in close collaboration
with internal and external research groups. siRNA libraries covering all human or mouse kinases were applied to cell viability/apoptosis, membrane lipid composition, three viral infection pathways, phagocytosis
of bacteria, Alzheimer, and osteoclast differentiation screens. Using the initial cell viability/apoptosis screens at 48 and 96 hours exposure time, we determined a temporal screening window for future
screens that consists of an acceptable compromise between maximizing incubation time to achieve the optimal silencing effect on the one hand, and minimizing the number of targets whose depletion significantly
affects cell viability on the other hand.
Our first functionality showcase was a multi-assay screening project applying two primary viral infection assays and six secondary endocytosis assays to dissect the viral infection routes. Screening
the whole human kinome, we identified a complex regulative network for two endocytotic routes (Pelkmans et al., Nature 2005, 436:78-86). The results formed the basis for the discovery of a new mechanism
of caveolae-mediated endocytosis (Pelkmans and Zerial, Nature 2005, 436:128-133).
This project has now evolved dramatically. Replacing the viruses with various fluorescently labeled endocytosed cargoes (e.g., growth factor receptors, other receptors) has made the screens far more
robust. A new version of the automated microscope OPERA has allowed us to add an additional fluorescent marker. A novel image analysis software concept programmed by a visiting professor at the institute,
Yannis Kalaidzidis, allows extraction of more than 40 parameters pertaining to the movement of the internalized cargoes, while access to the super computer at the Technical University, Dresden, allows
processing of such complex image analysis at the required scale of 100,000s of images. A genome-wide screen has now been initiated.
Services provided to the research group by Frank Buchholz have enabled the performance of a number of large-scale screens, as a result of which we published our first report on a screen to identify
new genes involved in cell proliferation and division (Kittler et al., Nature 2004, 432:1036-40). Further, a genome-wide four channel screen in dual-stable fluorescent C.elegans worms has been carried
out at the TDS and is currently being evaluated, along with the performance of subsequent hit verification studies.
Looking Ahead
In the very near future, parallel chemical screens will be performed under the umbrella of the Chemical Genomics Center of the Max Planck Society. Functional genomics and chemical biology will be linked
not only to identify new gene functions, but also to search for chemical modulators of the corresponding protein activities. We are inspired by the belief that multi-parametric cell-based analysis provide
extraordinary potential to achieve scientific progress and accelerate opportunities for therapeutic applications, principally by allowing better identification during early discovery of those compounds
that are most likely to yield successful drugs.
|